<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>betterc on luis space</title>
    <link>/tags/betterc/</link>
    <description>Recent content in betterc on luis space</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:07:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/tags/betterc/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Zettelkasten #1: Classes in D with betterC</title>
      <link>/posts/zet-1-classes-betterc-d/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2021 00:07:00 +0100</pubDate>
      
      <guid>/posts/zet-1-classes-betterc-d/</guid>
      <description>Did you know that you can use classes in D as better C? Yes, you read correctly, you can actually use classes in D with -betterC.
Problem involved The main problem with having normal classes in D as better C is the dependency of runtime hooks and runtime type information from the D runtime library. Since betterC has some limitations, including forbidden usage of runtime type information, users are usually stuck with features from D that doesn&amp;rsquo;t use the runtime.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
